What do you think of the terminology shift from 'child pornography (CP)' to 'child sexual abuse material (CSAM)'?
I think this change is...
• bad, CSAM is too censored or euphemistic
• bad, CSAM is too shocking
• bad, CSAM is a less recognizable acronym
• bad, CSAM is too vague to be useful
• bad, other reason(s)
• good, CP is too censored or euphemistic
• good, CP is too shocking
• good, CP sounds like the kids consent
• good, CP validates pedophiles' use of it
• good, other reason(s)
• neither, it should be called something else
• pedophile button (kys)
What do you think of the terminology shift from ‘child pornography (CP)’ to 'child sexual abuse material (CSAM)’?
bad, CSAM is too censored or euphemistic
bad, CSAM is too shocking
bad, CSAM is a less recognizable acronym
bad, CSAM is too vague to be useful
bad, other reason(s)
good, CP is too censored or euphemistic
good, CP is too shocking
good, CP sounds like the kids consent
good, CP validates pedophiles’ use of it
good, other reason(s)
neither, it should be called something else
pedophile button (kys)
See Results