i am not gonna lie a lot of you seem to be treating “presumption of innocence” as a technicality, a legal loophole, a little *wink wink, nudge nudge* “he’s the shooter lol except uuuh presumed innocent amirite” when talking about the mangione trial
some posts will have a “well we just don’t know, he could have done it but he also could have not” stance thats Slightly better, but even that is not enough.
Luigi Mangione is innocent. the prosecution, during the trial, would need to produce convincing, direct evidence (not the stupid forged shit the cops obviously planted) and i highly doubt that they’ll be able to, hence why they’re banking on getting everyone to treat him as the shooter already.
As the man himself said: This is completely unjust and is an insult to the intelligence of the American people and their lived experience.