kdinjenzen:

kdinjenzen:

kdinjenzen:

New Rule: If it’s SFW when a guy does it, it’s SFW when a girl does it.

Guy shirtless is SFW?
Girl shirtless is now SFW.

Guy with a noticeable bulge in a speedo is SFW?
Girl with a noticeable bulge in a speedo is SFW.

Etc, etc, etc.

I will not be taking any criticisms on this.

Deleting every stupid comment that says:

“Well actually NSFW means Not Safe For Work and-”

Because you motherfuckers know full well what I’m talking about and also know damn well that NSFW has become a blanket term for what is seen as inherently sexual versus what is seen as not inherently sexual.

This is about the fact that women’s bodies are always seen as sex objects regardless of their presentation, intention, or any attributing factors while men’s bodies are not.

“ACTUALLY men can’t be shirtless in places without being told they-”

I can go to comic book stores, game stores, the movies, collectors shops, sports stores, etc and get as many pictures of shirtless men on books, movies, games, trading cards, etc and it’s acceptable and fine.

If I ask for one with a topless woman on the cover I will be told that those either “aren’t sold here” or “are kept behind the counter in a sealed box with secondary covers that don’t show them bare chested”

If you’re watching a movie and in it a man wakes up in a movie after going to sleep and he’s shirtless and someone walks in while you’re watching they won’t say a word, but if it was a woman they’d give you a side eye.

Literally everyone saying “BUT BUT BUT” needs to shut the fuck up.