When creating art, how do you deal with the fact that seemingly everyone's opinions and tastes are completely individual? Like, how do you make good art, when around 40-50% of what even is "good art" changes from person to person? Sure, we have points we can all agree, but I'm baffled by how three people can agree and disagree on the same pieces of media. I can like movies A and B, and feel like they're very alike, but a friend might love B and hate A and another friend thinks the opposite.
The confusion is because “good” is being used to mean several different things:
- To My Personal Taste. If you like a piece of art, you could very easily describe it as good just because you had a good time with it.
- Well Put Together. If a story is well-crafted, lacking in plotholes or contrivances, broadly carefully woven, makes sense the more you think about it, etc - you could deem it to be good because it’s been put together well. If a work of art looks good, the light sources and shadows make sense with one another, the colors work well together, the composition has clarity, the anatomy is correct - then the work was put together competently and skillfully, and could be called good for this reason.
- Objective Quality. When people describe a movie as good, this is usually what they are trying to judge. Whether an objective judgment can be rendered on something as subjective as art is something people have been yelling about for centuries. In my estimation, the quality of a work has to be judged based on what the artist was going for and how close their execution was to that goal. An attempt at photorealism might be seen as “objectively bad” if it doesn’t look photorealistic.
And by the same token, “bad” can mean a BUNCH of different things:
- Bad Because I Had A Bad Time
- Bad Because It Didn’t Deliver What I Expected From It
- Bad Because It Hit Me With A Personal Dealbreaker
- Bad Because I Couldn’t Take It Seriously
- Bad Because It Didn’t Make Sense To Me
- Bad Because It Said Something I Really Disagreed With
And many more. This is why I think it’s helpful to unpack a story further than just “is it good or bad” because those judgments are almost always concealing a more interesting personal analysis. There are stories I find highly ineffective that are still professionally well-crafted and accomplishing the creator’s goals. There are stories I enjoy the hell out of that are weighed down by ropey characterization and dubious values. It’s usually more effective, in my experience, to narrow in and identify what parts of a work are working for you, and what parts aren’t clicking.