What I’ve learned communists are afraid of today:
- A classless, stateless society
- Communism
- Any society that doesn’t rely on compulsory labor
- Liberated workers
- The absence of the bourgeoise dictating worker’s actions
- The laborers themselves working for their own liberation
- The state withering away
- Anarchists that want communism
- Labor camps disappearing
- Communists that disagree with them
if there’s a community, of let’s say 100 people or so, and there are several disabled people in the community who need care, and those disabled people die because the abled people were unwilling to perform the labor to care for them, does the ethical framework you are operating on agree with mine that those abled people are morally in the wrong? yes or no.
11. Mutual Aid societies that operate outside of the bourgeoise framework of society
It’s revealing that Marxists keep falling back on the Adam Smith style of Liberal “let’s imagine an immaterial society to use as a parable” argumentation rather than any sort of historical analysis when dismissing anarchism
That’s a lot of jargon that I just read
What I gathered: There is some kind of argument going on
What I’m saying to butt in on it whether I have any knowledge or not: Why wouldn’t someone help the disabled people? Like, why would absolutely everyone just decide not to help
I can imagine a society where literally anything happens but that doesn’t mean it would become reality
fucking anarchists, THATS NOT COMMUNISTS THAT WAS THREE ANNOYING MLS. WE DISAGREE ON THREE FUKCING POINTS STOP INFIGHTING FOR THREE SECONDS HOLY SHIT
Ooooh infighting! That’s the type of argument happening here
I say that whatever you’re saying is probably right 👍