azspot:

“Taking into account these competing considerations, we conclude that the separation of powers principles explicated in our precedent necessitate at least a presumptive immunity from criminal prosecution for a President’s acts within the outer perimeter of his official responsibility. Such an immunity is required to safeguard the independence and effective functioning of the Executive Branch, and to enable the President to carry out his constitutional duties without undue caution.”

Worse than Dred Scott v. Sandford

What’s next? Immunity for congresspeople? Supreme court judges?? Mayors???

This is nonsense!