Oh and, by the way, asexual and aromantic people ARE queer.
Yes, even if they are heterosexual/romantic.
Yes, even if they are cis.
Yes, even if they aren’t considered ‘fully’ aromatic/asexual (greysexual, demi-romantic, ect.)
Yes, even if they are aromantic and romance favorable and/or asexual and sex favorable.
Yes, even if they don’t ‘act’ asexual and/or aromantic.
They are valid.
Shouldn’t we want to include as many people as possible??
Why the hell did anyone decide exclusion was a good idea? Does that not only hurt the queer movement?