Preindustrial travel, and long explanations on why different distances are like that
I saw a post on my main blog about how hiking groups need to keep pace with their slowest member, but many hikers mistakenly think that the point of hiking is “get from Point A to Point B as fast as possible” instead of “spending time outdoors in nature with friends,” and then they complain that a new/less-experienced/sick/disabled hiker is spoiling their time-frame by constantly needing breaks, or huffing and puffing to catch up.
I run into a related question of “how long does it take to travel from Point A to Point B on horseback?” a lot, as a fantasy writer who wants to be SEMI-realistic; in the Western world at least, our post-industrial minds have largely forgotten what it’s like to travel, both on our own feet and in groups.
People ask the new writer, “well, who in your cast is traveling? Is getting to Point B an emergency or not? What time of year is it?”, and the newbies often get confused as to why they need so much information for “travel times.” Maybe new writers see lists of “preindustrial travel times” like a primitive version of Google Maps, where all you need to do is plug in Point A and Point B.
But see, Google Maps DOES account for traveling delays, like different routes, constructions, accidents, and weather; you as the person will also need to figure in whether you’re driving a car versus taking a bus/train, and so you’ll need to figure out parking time or waiting time for the bus/train to actually GET THERE.
The difference between us and preindustrial travelers is that 1) we can outsource the calculations now, 2) we often travel for FUN instead of necessity.
The general rule of thumb for preindustrial times is that a healthy and prime-aged adult on foot, or a rider/horse pair of fit and prime-aged adults, can usually make 20-30 miles per day, in fair weather and on good terrain.
Why is this so specific? Because not everyone in preindustrial times was fit, not everyone was healthy, not everyone was between the ages of 20-35ish, and not everyone had nice clear skies and good terrain to travel on.
If you are too far below 18 years old or too far past 40, at best you will need either a slower pace or more frequent breaks to cover the same distance, and at worst you’ll cut the travel distance in half to 10 or so miles. Too much walking is VERY BAD on too-young/old knees, and teenagers or very short adults may just have short legs even if they’re fine with 8-10 hours of actual walking. Young children may get sick of walking and pitch a fit because THEY’RE TIREDDDDDDDDDD, and then you might need to stay put while they cry it out, or an adult may sigh and haul them over their shoulder (and therefore be weighed down by about 50lbs of Angry Child).
Heavy forests, wetlands and rocky hills/mountains are also going to be a much shorter “distance.” For forests or wetlands, you have to account for a lot of villagers going “who’s gonna cut down acres of trees for one road? NOT ME,” or “who’s gonna drain acres of swamp for one road? NOT ME.” Mountainous regions have their traveling time eaten by going UP, or finding a safer path that goes AROUND.
If you are traveling in winter or during a rainstorm (and this inherently means you HAVE NO CHOICE, because nobody in preindustrial times would travel in bad weather if they could help it), you run the high risk of losing your way and then dying of exposure or slipping and breaking your neck, just a few miles out of the town/village.
And now for the upper range of “traveling on horseback!”
Fully mounted groups can usually make 30-40 miles per day between Point A and Point B, but I find there are two unspoken requirements: “Point B must have enough food for all those people and horses,” and “the mounted party DOESN’T need to keep pace with foot soldiers, camp followers, or supply wagons.”
This means your mounted party would be traveling to 1) a rendezvous point like an ally’s camp or a noble’s castle, or 2) a town/city with plenty of inns. Maybe they’re not literally going 30-40 miles in one trip, but they’re scouting the area for 15-20 miles and then returning to their main group. Perhaps they’d be going to an allied village, but even a relatively small group of 10-20 warhorses will need 10-20 pounds of grain EACH and 20-30 pounds of hay EACH. 100-400 pounds of grain and 200-600 pounds of hay for the horses alone means that you need to stash supplies at the village beforehand, or the village needs to be a very large/prosperous one to have a guaranteed large surplus of food.
A dead sprint of 50-60 miles per day is possible for a preindustrial mounted pair, IF YOU REALLY, REALLY HAVE TO. Moreover, that is for ONE day. Many articles agree that 40 miles per day is already a hard ride, so 50-60 miles is REALLY pushing the envelope on horse and rider limits.
NOTE: While modern-day endurance rides routinely go for 50-100 miles in one day, remember that a preindustrial rider will not have the medical/logistical support that a modern endurance rider and their horse does.
If you say “they went fifty miles in a day” in most preindustrial times, the horse and rider’s bodies will get wrecked. Either the person, their horse, or both, risk dying of exhaustion or getting disabled from the strain.
Whether you and your horse are fit enough to handle it and “only” have several days of defenselessness from severe pain/fatigue (and thus rely on family/friends to help you out), or you die as a heroic sacrifice, or you aren’t QUITE fit enough and become disabled, or you get flat-out saved by magic or another rider who volunteers to go the other half, going past 40 miles in a day is a “Gondor Calls For Aid” level of emergency.
As a writer, I feel this kind of feat should be placed VERY carefully in a story: Either at the beginning to kick the plot off, at the climax to turn the tide, or at the end.
Preindustrial people were people–some treated their horses as tools/vehicles, and didn’t care if they were killed or disabled by pushing them to their limits, but others very much cared for their horses. They needed to keep them in working condition for about 15-20 years, and they would not dream of doing this without a VERY good reason.
All of this, with one additional nudge : even the people who thought of horses as I think of my car often cared intensely about the possibility of killing or disabling a horse by mishandling it. I would personally be furious if some feckless wastrel took my car and raced it over uneven ground so that it the suspension was shot to hell and the car had to be totaled and sold for parts. And I do not drive a nice car!
Today, we tend to think of horses as cheap to buy and expensive to maintain because those are the real incentive costs in a modern economy. In much of human history, though, horses were EXPENSIVE — that’s a big reason that we associate them to heavily with nobility! Other draft livestock are going to be even slower—good luck making quick time on a donkey or an ox cart—and harder to convince to move quickly for extended periods. And if you’re carrying supplies or any substatial weight? You’ll be lucky to get ten miles, and twenty will be a feat of extraordinary effort akin to a rider doing forty or fifty.
much like cars, draft animals are expensive things that are often vital to either your livelihood, your social life, or both. If there are towns separately by large distances in the setting, then you’d need some way for people to get between them - and if someone’s job relied on travelling between these towns either quickly (messengers, certain service jobs like mercenaries) or carrying a lot of goods between these towns (merchants, traders, etc), their animal being injured or killed would ruin their day, if not their life.
Vague literature based memories (of, like 19th century)? inform me of an infrastructure thing that is a network of, like, stables? courier stations? where a person can CHANGE HORSES (the horses are presumably all government-owned, as is the whole network) and keep going very, very fast in an emergency. I THINK it was specifically for government couriers, but logic dictates that a private individual could probably pay for the service?
Your weekly reminder that this “preindustrial travel” post has been updated A LOT! https://jadevine.tumblr.com/post/738801850678116352/preindustrial-travel-and-long-explanations-on-why
previous poster’s tags: #writing #fascinating info really #that last tidbit seems true though im pretty sure thats how the US postal service started out basically
The Pony Express is very famous… and very short-lived! https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pony_Express
There was also a preindustrial version of it: The Persian / Achaemenid Empire’s postal service! https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chapar_Khaneh
Notice how this is an EMPIRE and not a “Kingdom,” though?
Read more for why the Pony Express is Not Practical!
@lilietsblog forgot to tag you in my response, but there’s the Pony Express and the Persian Empire’s courier service, who both embody the sheer difficulty of “Hey, if you switch out horses, you could cover a LOT MORE ground! Why hasn’t anyone done it?”
Tealdeer: Switching out horses every ten miles and going full-speed across the country is enormously expensive and enormously dangerous.