betweenparallels:

terminal-burrowing-deactivated2:

t4t4t:

Anyone have that image of like 8 ways of settler colonial justifications ? One of them is terra nullius, can’t find it.

This one?

Image provided is a list titled ‘Eight Stages of White Settler-Colonial Denial,’ which lists the following stages:

1. “They didn’t exist” (terra nullius)
Complete denial of Indigenous presence in a given area (country, province, etc). Includes denial of Indigeneity, e.g. “Indigenous Peoples are Settlers too”.

2. “If they did, the weren’t here” (terra nullius)
Denial that Indigenous People inhabit/travel/harvest/exist in a specific area. Often based on euro-centric definitions of evidence of occupation.

3. “If they were, they didn’t use the land” (doctrine of discovery)
Denial that Indigenous People have a connection with the Land. Often based on euro-centric worldviews of the land as something to be owned and extracted.

4. “If they did, they didn’t deserve it” (great chain of being)
Denial that Indigenous People have rights to their Lands. Often based on euro-centric value judgements of “primitive vs. civilized”, “nomadic vs. sedentary”.

5. “If they did, they lost it” (right of conquest)
Denial that Indigenous People retain their rights to their Lands. Often based on colonially imposed European systems of law / “might makes right” worldviews.

6. “If they didn’t, it doesn’t matter any more” (Westphalian sovereignty)
Denial that Indigenous Rights are still binding and take precedence. Often based on false claims of supremacy of colonial legal institutions and systems.

7. “If it does, we need to move on” (liberalism)
Denial that violations of Indigenous Rights require redress. Often based on on claims redress is “disruptive/unfair/reverse racism” & false calls for “equality”.

8. “If we can’t, we are you” (self-indigenization)
Denial of separateness of Indigenous Peoples and Rights. Often based on attempts to reduce Indigenous Rights to Human Rights, claim Indigeneity, etc.