Slow, inexorable transformation in a tumblr sexyman.
You don’t turn into a ravenous wolfman every full moon, but you’re utterly convinced you do.
Every car you enter becomes a cybertruck.
Transparent skin and glowing bones.
You constantly hear Doug Walker reacting to everything you do in your head.
You can’t perceive cats anymore.
Everyone you love will die, in probably a maximum of 90 years.
Can’t ever enter Nevada.
Will instantly die if you ever see a tiktok.
Every meal you eat is mashed potatoes. No matter what you intended to make, order or buy, it’s mashed potatoes.
Thou cannot walketh where a passenger pigeon flew this tenday (this was a bigger problem 200 years ago).
In seven days, Sadako will do a corporate buyout of your workplace and fire you.
You are simultaneously desperate to find truth but have limited perceptions and subjective biases that render you fundamentally unable to ever be truly certain of truth, as well as fearing death while being unavoidably mortal, unlike most people who are immortal and know the universe directly.
english slang is awful i would hate to be learning this shit. like the word shit. something can be horseshit or bullshit which means it’s a lie. but cow shit is just poop. and something can be dogshit which means it’s really bad quality. but cat shit is just poop.
more notes: batshit means CRAAAZY. but rat shit is poop. if something is shit, it’s bad, but if it’s THE shit, it’s good. eating shit is ew. but if someone just ate shit, they fell on the ground. no shit? = for real? yeah no shit = duh!!!
no sorry i dont really use instagram, i can contact you via ouija board, spirit box, fluctuations in temperature, flickering lights, and certain rituals. i am also on tumblr.
if you want people to “DNI” then your banner has to be legible
(I had a play around with this on a colour blind filter site, and it looks like all of the “Good” ones work as well or even better for colourblindness of various types).
“Jay-walking laws are bullshit created through auto industry lobbying” and “designated times and places to cross the road, especially in busy areas, makes roads much safer for both pedestrians and drivers” are statements that can coexist btw.
Showing off cool party trick where I can just identify the model of a lock and somehow the conversation shifted over to how four of them apparently think I’m hot and I don’t know what to do
hey why the hell is this getting more than 3 notes
* (Oh, my precious parentheses… (I don’t ever want to close them!
a lot of people in the notes are saying stuff like “this sounds like undertale dialogue” as if there aren’t asterisks before every line, my username isn’t abandoned-quiche, and my profile picture isn’t kris deltarune
1,762, you say? oh and two more. So that’s 1,764 then. Well don’t mind if I do.
oh yeah I felt like there was a connection between Conclave (movie about the cardinals choosing a new pope) and The Residence (murder mystery TV series about detective in the White House) and that is the uneasy relationship with the institutions being portrayed (the upper level of the Catholic Church and the US executive branch).
in both cases the protagonists and the stories themselves view the institutions as flawed but still fundamentally necessary in some way, and depending on how you view it that can come across as a sincere expression of belief in the ideals that they represent (American democracy, the Christian religion) or a somewhat craven deference to the importance of these institutions, demonstrating awareness by paying lip service to the need for reform while shying away from the true weight of their fundamental problems.
I think this accurately captures the split at the heart of liberal centrism: is it really enough to keep the church and the presidency and just hope they elect the right people to run them? is there any critique that would demand a more serious response?
it almost feels like a form of inoculation, the idea that we know the people are doing a good job because they wrestle with doubts about how the institution has failed society, and from that we can conclude that they have not failed society! it’s not entirely false but it’s slippery and makes it dangerously easy to rationalise away atrocities.
So if Bill!Sans is a mix between Bill Cipher and Sans, two of the most notable tumblr sexymen, does that mean that his rival would be a combination of Alastor and The Onceler
well
Forcefully reminding you that this exists
FERB, I KNOW WHAT WE’RE GONNA DO TODAY
If this post gets to 500 notes I will draw them pregnant. Both of them. This is a threat.
“Why is it a problem if students use AI to get through college”
Because if you demonstrate to me that you’re willing to set aside concern for truth, evidence, and verifying things with your own eyes whenever it happens to be inconvenient for you, I have a solemn responsibility to make sure you don’t get into medical school.
“oh, but this course is just a distribution requirement, it’s not for my major”
Does saying things that are true and that you know are true only matter when someone is giving you a little prize for it?
Tumblr doesn’t like to do this kind of ethics, so I have to phrase this carefully, but it’s a question of character. And a person’s character is clearest when they’re being asked to do the right thing even when it doesn’t matter to them.
I don’t want to live in a world in which doctors and lawyers and politicians just ignore the responsibility to research and verify when it’s inconvenient for them. When they’re busy. When they have something they’d rather be doing. The world I live in is already too full of those people in positions of power. I’ll be damned if I let there be more of them.
i love opening my mutual’s blog every morning like it’s the newspaper. like ah yes this moot has a new hyperfixation, ohh and this moot is having a mental breakdown, and this moot hasn’t returned from hibernation
Good news: I’ve got a doctor’s appointment coming up concerning getting spayed.
Bad news: They estimated that it’ll be in 10-11 months. In about one year they’ll have a doctor who has the time to have a look concerning getting me neutered recreationally.
Ummmm… Spaying is for XX genitals, neutering is for XY genitals. Unless you have both, you can’t get both (:
Not true actually! Neutering refers to sterilization of either sex, the idea that it only refers to male animals is a misconception. Spaying refers to the removal of the uterus (and sometimes the ovaries) of an animal. Castration is the removal of the testicles of a male animal (but can also mean the removal of the ovaries).
I would like u t take your corrections and put them elsewhere. Clearly they are not welcme on this post. I worked at the animal shelter and spaying was girls and neutering was boys. And no, I will not be carefully reading your post.
Anyway, the fastest way to learn your assumptions were wrong is to confidently assert them online. Oopsie.
I’m still not sure whether you’re serious or a gimmick blog.
ALT
ALT
