…I want to just draw a fashion zine of just Miss Piggy, oh my god. she is so underrated and underutilized, where is my succession-like muppets satire thing LOL I want it so bad. let me do it disney call me pls
coffee shop by my house hired a new barista who is extraordinarily hot and flirts with me incessantly but she also makes the worst - and i truly mean the worst - coffee i’ve ever paid for. atrociously bad. just another of god’s little jokes
just remembered the barista who worked there last year and treated me with an attitude generally reserved for children and the incompetent to the point where she would frequently adjust my drink order in front of me and every single time it was BANGIN’
any statistic that shows that trans men are more oppressed than trans women or vice versa feels irrelevant because the difference is always negligible and changes between studies. i’ve seen studies that say trans women are sexually assaulted more often, that trans men are sexually assaulted more often, that trans women are more likely to live in poverty, that trans men are more likely to live in poverty - you get the gist - both while doing my own research and from sources i’ve been given by other people
the majority of the time the full picture is trans people do not have wildly different experiences from each other. the majority of the time race is more of an influence in the violence trans people face than their gender. unfortunately, people use statistics to fuel their confirmation bias over petty “trans men are more oppressed” and “trans women are more oppressed” discourse that does nothing but make talking about transphobia an active minefield.
i see this especially when people argue against statistics that don’t fit their own narrative of one kind of transphobia being worse than the other argue that it’s because hyperinvisibility makes it go underreported, while simultaneously ignoring or downplaying the invisibility that the other side faces. it’s all blatantly biased
this isn’t to say transmisogyny and antitransmasculinity have no meaningful differences, they do, but the idea that one is provably “worse” is almost never backed up by in-depth research and usually stems from the biased perspective of one person who only experiences one kind of oppression and not the other, and automatically assumes that the other one isn’t as bad because they haven’t seen the full extent of it
it’s inherently a losing battle and ultimately just takes away from discussions of transmisogyny and antitransmasculinity by turning what could’ve been valuable essays and theory into pissing contests that barely even talk about transmisogyny or antitransmasculinity
the moral of the story is you people need to listen to each other more
Transmasc and transfem people experience different forms of oppression (and we should listen to each other to learn more about that)
But arguing about who is oppressed more and who is less privileged isn’t productive. It’s not a contest and we should not be enemies.
Even if one group is more oppressed than the other, it wouldn’t make a difference to the fact that we need to listen to each other about the unique forms of oppression each of us face.
Thank you, @w1cked-w1tch , for invoking the phrase Oppression Olympics.
any statistic that shows that trans men are more oppressed than trans women or vice versa feels irrelevant because the difference is always negligible and changes between studies. i’ve seen studies that say trans women are sexually assaulted more often, that trans men are sexually assaulted more often, that trans women are more likely to live in poverty, that trans men are more likely to live in poverty - you get the gist - both while doing my own research and from sources i’ve been given by other people
the majority of the time the full picture is trans people do not have wildly different experiences from each other. the majority of the time race is more of an influence in the violence trans people face than their gender. unfortunately, people use statistics to fuel their confirmation bias over petty “trans men are more oppressed” and “trans women are more oppressed” discourse that does nothing but make talking about transphobia an active minefield.
i see this especially when people argue against statistics that don’t fit their own narrative of one kind of transphobia being worse than the other argue that it’s because hyperinvisibility makes it go underreported, while simultaneously ignoring or downplaying the invisibility that the other side faces. it’s all blatantly biased
this isn’t to say transmisogyny and antitransmasculinity have no meaningful differences, they do, but the idea that one is provably “worse” is almost never backed up by in-depth research and usually stems from the biased perspective of one person who only experiences one kind of oppression and not the other, and automatically assumes that the other one isn’t as bad because they haven’t seen the full extent of it
it’s inherently a losing battle and ultimately just takes away from discussions of transmisogyny and antitransmasculinity by turning what could’ve been valuable essays and theory into pissing contests that barely even talk about transmisogyny or antitransmasculinity
the moral of the story is you people need to listen to each other more
Transmasc and transfem people experience different forms of oppression (and we should listen to each other to learn more about that)
But arguing about who is oppressed more and who is less privileged isn’t productive. It’s not a contest and we should not be enemies.
Even if one group is more oppressed than the other, it wouldn’t make a difference to the fact that we need to listen to each other about the unique forms of oppression each of us face.
Thank you, @w1cked-w1tch , for invoking the phrase Oppression Olympics.
any statistic that shows that trans men are more oppressed than trans women or vice versa feels irrelevant because the difference is always negligible and changes between studies. i’ve seen studies that say trans women are sexually assaulted more often, that trans men are sexually assaulted more often, that trans women are more likely to live in poverty, that trans men are more likely to live in poverty - you get the gist - both while doing my own research and from sources i’ve been given by other people
the majority of the time the full picture is trans people do not have wildly different experiences from each other. the majority of the time race is more of an influence in the violence trans people face than their gender. unfortunately, people use statistics to fuel their confirmation bias over petty “trans men are more oppressed” and “trans women are more oppressed” discourse that does nothing but make talking about transphobia an active minefield.
i see this especially when people argue against statistics that don’t fit their own narrative of one kind of transphobia being worse than the other argue that it’s because hyperinvisibility makes it go underreported, while simultaneously ignoring or downplaying the invisibility that the other side faces. it’s all blatantly biased
this isn’t to say transmisogyny and antitransmasculinity have no meaningful differences, they do, but the idea that one is provably “worse” is almost never backed up by in-depth research and usually stems from the biased perspective of one person who only experiences one kind of oppression and not the other, and automatically assumes that the other one isn’t as bad because they haven’t seen the full extent of it
it’s inherently a losing battle and ultimately just takes away from discussions of transmisogyny and antitransmasculinity by turning what could’ve been valuable essays and theory into pissing contests that barely even talk about transmisogyny or antitransmasculinity
the moral of the story is you people need to listen to each other more
Transmasc and transfem people experience different forms of oppression (and we should listen to each other to learn more about that)
But arguing about who is oppressed more and who is less privileged isn’t productive. It’s not a contest and we should not be enemies.
Even if one group is more oppressed than the other, it wouldn’t make a difference to the fact that we need to listen to each other about the unique forms of oppression each of us face.
Thank you, @w1cked-w1tch , for invoking the phrase Oppression Olympics.
I got a laptop with Windows 11 for an IT course so I can get certified, and doing the first time device set-up for it made me want to commit unspeakable violence
Windows 11 should not exist, no one should use it for any reason, it puts ads in the file explorer and has made it so file searches are also web searches and this cannot be turned off except through registry editing. Whoever is responsible for those decisions should be killed, full stop.
Switch to linux, it’s free and it’s good.
u r absolutely right I have SO many complaints about Windows omg.
For anyone who’d like to follow along, I’m gonna share how to get around those things with group policies bc they’re more user friendly and descriptive than registry editor imo :3 I’ll also show how to get around needing a Microsoft account to get setup.
For the Device Setup
“OOBE” stands for Out Of Box Experience which is what that setup workflow is. But it also happens to be a folder with a little program in it that’ll let you skip connecting to the internet; this makes it so you don’t have to sign up with a Microsoft account and can just use a normal local one instead. And it already comes preinstalled! Here’s how you get to it:
Hold Shift+ F10, or Shift + Fn + F10 depending on your keyboard.
Click inside the window that pops up, type the following and press enter afterwards to run it: OOBE\BypassNRO
I believe it should restart your computer automatically, but if not then restart your computer or type: shutdown /r /t 0 /f
Now when you’re brought back to the setup workflow, the page where you connect to the internet will have a new button on it that lets you say you don’t have internet. Clicking that and proceeding through the rest of the setup lets you get around the Microsoft account thing.
Group Policies
You don’t have to know much about them, these are just a bunch of specific settings for what your computer can or can’t do that lets you decide how it works in different ways.
I’m gonna show you how to turn off the recommendations and internet stuff basically. For now bring up search and type gpedit, pick this
It’ll open up to Local Group Policy Editor and we can get started :3c
Start Recommendations
In the side menu, go to User Configuration > Administrative Templates > Start Menu and Taskbar. Click on Settings to sort them with all the “Turn off” ones bumped to the top.
Here’s what you should set:
Turn off user tracking: enabled
Turn off feature advertisement balloon notifications: enabled
Remove Recommended section from Start Menu: enabled
Remove Personalized Website Recommendations from the Recommended section in the Start Menu: enabled
Do not search Internet: enabled
Windows Spotlight
Back in the side menu, go down to Windows Components > Cloud Content
Turn off all Windows spotlight features: enabled
Do not use diagnostic data for tailored experiences: enabled
Cortana
In the side menu, this one’s back at the top under Computer Configuration. You’re gonna want to go to Computer Configuration > Administrative Templates > Windows Components > Search
Allow Cortana: disabled
Don’t search the web or display web results in Search: enabled
News and Interests
In the side menu go to Computer Configuration > Administrative Templates > Windows Components > News and interests.
Enable news and interests on the taskbar: disabled
Microsoft Account Login Nudges
When you don’t use a Microsoft account they’ll nudge you repeatedly to sign in so you can “get the most out of your experience” *gag*. The group policy for turning that off has a note that suggests it might not work with Windows 11 though (implicitly), so you can close the group policy editor window now and for this last one let’s just open up the regular settings.
Go to System > Notifications > Additional settings, then uncheck all the boxes. And there ya go! (✿◠‿◠)ﾉ u are done.
Group policies are kind of a rabbit hole so while there is a lot more you could change or read into, for your own sanity’s sake I would advise against it and say call it a day lol
This is all extremely good information, thank you very much for the addition!
I endorse this as an IT technician. I do this to every new Win11 device I set up.
As a bonus, run Chris Titus Tech’s debloat tool on it.
It allows you to add tools, remove/disable shitty parts of windows, and easily change some settings. My default is running the preset for a desktop/laptop and applying security update settings, but there are so many options to customize. I used it on my personal laptop.
An incredible resource this post, required reading really
Yep. If for whatever reason you need to use windows, this is the first step
win10 was already a far too eager to think i have or care to have a ms account and had the sheer fucking audacity to have a candy crush in the start menu
win11 was dead to me the second i learned they wanted to shutter win10 for a functionally identical os save for crowbarred in ai non-features and a graphical change that made power users have to do one (1) extra click to get to the actually useful right click menu.
for people like me there is less jank and command line fuckery with linux than windows and that’s saying a lot. frankly if you have the time for it you should try livebooting linux, i’m with linux mint and cannot fathom moving back to windows.
reminder that being against ai also means being against character.ai and not using character.ai and not interacting with character.ai
i’ve never talked to chatgpt i’ve never talked to character.ai i have no interest in talking to a chatbot even if it’s fun or based on my comfort character. if we want companies to stop using ai we need to tell them we aren’t going to interact with it - so don’t.
don’t talk to robots. full stop.
if you’re seeing this it means you’re on tumblr. there are like 600 gay people on here who will rp with you, you don’t need c.ai for anything
I believe the English phrase is “odd duck.” Yes. Jan Kargad was an Odd Duck. He was born in 1922, right after Georgia joined the Soviet Union, in a commune outside of Batumi. But this was not a normal commune no. His parents were strange people. A small group of Dutch fuckers, very protestant people, started a winery in the countryside where they could read their bibles. You would think they did not get along with the Marxists, but you would be wrong. They loved work. The bible loved work. There was no problem.
Well, that is not entirely true. Jan was a bit of a problem. He was born with a “weak constitution.” We do not know what that meant exactly, but farmwork would give him seizures and very high fevers. He was not a good child for farm work. So, they taught him arithmetic. Young Jan was in charge of counting grapes and bottles of wine and so on. Maybe the Apparatchik did not mind a child doing all the counting, maybe he was bribed, maybe he did not give a shit. I do not know. But Jan was in charge of all the counting and, what is the fucking word- logistics. Yes. Logistics. And he was very good at logistics.
There are theories as to his upbringing yes. Studying the bible alongside Marx and Lenin and so on. But I do not believe this. In Chechnya in those days many studied the bible and Marx like Jan Kargad, but we did not become like Jan Kargad. I think perhaps it was the fevers. One sees things with a fever when it is bad enough, yes.
Kargad also studied the capitalists. He was very good at this. He read Adam Smith, but also Issac Newton, the South Seas bubble, and most famously the Tulip Panic. They say his journals were filled with pressed tulips. He was a bit of a, what is the fucking English word- pervert. A pervert for organizing things and numbers and so on. Jan Kargad loves logistics like a man loves his wife, and tulips are a symbol of this for him. They became a microcosm for him. You see how the bud unfolds into many petals, its is very similar to how capitalism unfurls into its many aspects in the world. But, I am getting ahead of myself.
One day, after all of his schooling, Kargad has a terrible fever, more terrible than any fever he has ever had. This is in the early 1940s some time. After this fever he becomes strange. Well, stranger than he already was. He speaks of men with golden dog masks, their necks chained to the sun, tulips growing from their eyes, all of that shit. He never goes outside again. He becomes fearful of the sun. He does not let it touch his skin.
He writes intensely for the next three years. I have seen his original notebooks and they are stained with sweat. This man is not well, but he writes. He does not get help, because he is very good at analyzing agricultural output. I believe it grounded him some how, to spend days without sleep, reading spreadsheets about grapes and wheat and so on.
He is no longer christian. He throws out all of the crosses in his home, and replaces them with grape-cutters. They are similar to a sickle, but with a long handle, for reaching up and cutting off high bunches of grapes. He becomes obsessed with this idea of the grape cutter, and he begins to paint. And this is where many first learn of him. He influences a group of artists who become famous in the southern soviet union, though they are occasionally derided as being “mystical.” I personally? I love the drawings. Many figures reaching up to pluck grapes from the sun. It becomes the central theme of his work.
Here people discover his strange writings. But first he is considered a strange mystic. His early writings are still very christian yes, and this influences how he is read in the west. Many think he is speaking of hyper-economics or whatever fetishistic bull shit the americans are calling it. But I do not think so. His work is very soviet. There are stories yes, of good soviet men drinking coffee and loving spreadsheets like a man loves his wife, and in this they become a little bit like Jan Kargad. They are –you do not have an English term for this– cutting grapes from the sun. But this is not a serious phrase you understand. These men are perverts.
I believe the English phrase is “odd duck.” Yes. Jan Kargad was an Odd Duck. He was born in 1922, right after Georgia joined the Soviet Union, in a commune outside of Batumi. But this was not a normal commune no. His parents were strange people. A small group of Dutch fuckers, very protestant people, started a winery in the countryside where they could read their bibles. You would think they did not get along with the Marxists, but you would be wrong. They loved work. The bible loved work. There was no problem.
Well, that is not entirely true. Jan was a bit of a problem. He was born with a “weak constitution.” We do not know what that meant exactly, but farmwork would give him seizures and very high fevers. He was not a good child for farm work. So, they taught him arithmetic. Young Jan was in charge of counting grapes and bottles of wine and so on. Maybe the Apparatchik did not mind a child doing all the counting, maybe he was bribed, maybe he did not give a shit. I do not know. But Jan was in charge of all the counting and, what is the fucking word- logistics. Yes. Logistics. And he was very good at logistics.
There are theories as to his upbringing yes. Studying the bible alongside Marx and Lenin and so on. But I do not believe this. In Chechnya in those days many studied the bible and Marx like Jan Kargad, but we did not become like Jan Kargad. I think perhaps it was the fevers. One sees things with a fever when it is bad enough, yes.
Kargad also studied the capitalists. He was very good at this. He read Adam Smith, but also Issac Newton, the South Seas bubble, and most famously the Tulip Panic. They say his journals were filled with pressed tulips. He was a bit of a, what is the fucking English word- pervert. A pervert for organizing things and numbers and so on. Jan Kargad loves logistics like a man loves his wife, and tulips are a symbol of this for him. They became a microcosm for him. You see how the bud unfolds into many petals, its is very similar to how capitalism unfurls into its many aspects in the world. But, I am getting ahead of myself.
One day, after all of his schooling, Kargad has a terrible fever, more terrible than any fever he has ever had. This is in the early 1940s some time. After this fever he becomes strange. Well, stranger than he already was. He speaks of men with golden dog masks, their necks chained to the sun, tulips growing from their eyes, all of that shit. He never goes outside again. He becomes fearful of the sun. He does not let it touch his skin.
He writes intensely for the next three years. I have seen his original notebooks and they are stained with sweat. This man is not well, but he writes. He does not get help, because he is very good at analyzing agricultural output. I believe it grounded him some how, to spend days without sleep, reading spreadsheets about grapes and wheat and so on.
He is no longer christian. He throws out all of the crosses in his home, and replaces them with grape-cutters. They are similar to a sickle, but with a long handle, for reaching up and cutting off high bunches of grapes. He becomes obsessed with this idea of the grape cutter, and he begins to paint. And this is where many first learn of him. He influences a group of artists who become famous in the southern soviet union, though they are occasionally derided as being “mystical.” I personally? I love the drawings. Many figures reaching up to pluck grapes from the sun. It becomes the central theme of his work.
Here people discover his strange writings. But first he is considered a strange mystic. His early writings are still very christian yes, and this influences how he is read in the west. Many think he is speaking of hyper-economics or whatever fetishistic bull shit the americans are calling it. But I do not think so. His work is very soviet. There are stories yes, of good soviet men drinking coffee and loving spreadsheets like a man loves his wife, and in this they become a little bit like Jan Kargad. They are –you do not have an English term for this– cutting grapes from the sun. But this is not a serious phrase you understand. These men are perverts.
AITA for divorcing my vampire husband because he lied to me about his human job?
I (542 vampire) and my husband (260 vampire) have been together for a little over two centuries. There’s a saying in the vampiric community that it takes a century for a tryst to become an enduring partnership and another century to become soulmates. I thought that was true and that Matthew (using his real name because fuck you, Matthew) and I would be together forever…until this week.
First, let me explain a few things to the mortals here. I don’t mean that negatively – I came here specifically to get the opinion of those with a finite lifespan. However, I want to be fair to Matthew as much as possible and some of his decisions are very immortal-minded.
Both Matthew and I are vampires who have chosen to forsake some of our powers in exchange for the ability to daywalk. We made the transition together on our 100th anniversary almost 115 years ago. It wasn’t an easy transition for me. I was very dependent on human blood and I spent the first twenty years in almost constant sleep as my body adjusted to running off of less lunar magic and more solar magic.
It really felt like I was losing everything. My body got physically weaker and my powers began to disappear one by one. It felt like every time I woke, another part of me was missing. One day I could turn into a wolf, the next I could barely turn into a vapor. I could command a legion of undying servants, and then I could barely convince the mailman he didn’t see me levitate down from the second floor.
Matthew, however, took to daywalking like a werewolf to a sheep farm. He barely seemed to feel the pain of losing his power, maybe because he was so much younger than me. Whatever the case, he was out all the time once he stabilized. He would be gone for days sometimes and when he came back it was with fantastic stories about the humans’ new inventions or the new structures being built in whatever town we were in.
I just really hate Thing You Like. It’s sooo stupid and poorly-written and all the fans are dumb idiots for liking it 😂
#Blorbo Blingus especially is such a bad character but Blorbo fans can’t tell because they’re stupid #Thing You Like #TYL #Blorbo Blingus #Blorbo from Thing You Like
I just really hate Thing You Like. It’s sooo stupid and poorly-written and all the fans are dumb idiots for liking it 😂
#Blorbo Blingus especially is such a bad character but Blorbo fans can’t tell because they’re stupid #Thing You Like #TYL #Blorbo Blingus #Blorbo from Thing You Like
wow i wonder what trans women could possibly dislike about a prescriptive system of categorisation assigned at birth. good thing sherlock holmes is public domain because nobody else could crack this big fucking mystery
‘in defence of my comfort pseudoscience, it is in fact meaningless bullshit that says nothing’
No no my beliefs aren’t deterministic, but by the way have you considered maybe you only disagree with me because of your male socialisation?
It is the first of January, so works from 1929 are now public domain in the United States. Here are some of them.
The Skeleton Dance, drawn by Ub Iwerks, music by Carl Stalling.
The Cocoanuts, the first Marx Brothers film (not counting an earlier unreleased silent film).
“Ain’t Misbehavin’,” by Andy Razaf, Fats Waller, Harry Brooks. (Only the composition is public domain, not this particular recording, which is from 1943. But hey, any chance to play a clip from Stormy Weather is a good one.)
“Rhapsody in Blue,” performed by Paul Whiteman and His Orchestra. (As a sound recording – the composition, by George Gershwin, was already public domain.)
The Treachery of Images, by René Magritte.
The earliest “Thimble Theaters” comics featuring Popeye the Sailor.
A Farewell to Arms, by Ernest Hemingway
And many, many other works, which you can read about here. Happy Public Domain Day!
i just think itd be funny if kittypets were a little more familiar to twoleg things such as: cars and bad words
I haven’t reblogged something related to Warrior cats since like 2012 but this is fucking hilarious
ya know I was talking to this girl last year about childhood books and she told me that I probably read the warrior cats as a kid and I asked why and she just said “you’re the type that would” do you think she just clocked me as a furry
It is the first of January, so works from 1929 are now public domain in the United States. Here are some of them.
The Skeleton Dance, drawn by Ub Iwerks, music by Carl Stalling.
The Cocoanuts, the first Marx Brothers film (not counting an earlier unreleased silent film).
“Ain’t Misbehavin’,” by Andy Razaf, Fats Waller, Harry Brooks. (Only the composition is public domain, not this particular recording, which is from 1943. But hey, any chance to play a clip from Stormy Weather is a good one.)
“Rhapsody in Blue,” performed by Paul Whiteman and His Orchestra. (As a sound recording – the composition, by George Gershwin, was already public domain.)
The Treachery of Images, by René Magritte.
The earliest “Thimble Theaters” comics featuring Popeye the Sailor.
A Farewell to Arms, by Ernest Hemingway
And many, many other works, which you can read about here. Happy Public Domain Day!
ALT
ALT
ALT
ALT
ALT
ALT
