January 2024

thowawayuntilfurthernotice:

You’d think that something as historic as South Africa holding the Israeli government accountable for their war crimes would be on every single news channel.

Except it wasn’t, most western media outlets flat out refused to broadcast the International Court Hearing. But they were more than willing to broadcast the Israeli government’s response.

Because fuck forbid western audiences hear something other than “Israel has a right to defend itself.” or “Hamas. October 7th.”

whydidisavethistomyphone:

“Hamas shouldn’t have attacked”

🙃

The Israeli genocide of Palestinians has been ongoing for 70 years.

styx-doesnt-do-art:

eira-kuso:

captain-price-unofficially:

Look what the 2000s did to our women’s balls

Look how they massacared their balls

littlepawzbigheart:

aceofsharks:

Every time you reblog Sleepy Mars, a transphobe chokes and dies

nameforthemain:

Alligator Loki #28: Chomp

fleshdyke:

fleshdyke:

“the curse of knowledge is that you can’t unlearn something” yes i can

i can forget anything

heritageposts:

:

Here is a masterlist of every single genocidal statement made by the State of Israel, all appropriately quoted and sourced.

These statements cannot be retracted.

Quote from Avi Dichter, the Israeli State Minister of Agriculture and Development that reads "We are now rolling out the Gaza Nakba [...] There is no way to wage a war - as the IDF seeks to do in Gaza - with masses between the tanks and the soldiers [...] Gaza Nakba 2023. That's how it'll end. " End Quote. Statement made 11/11/2023. ALT

Quote from the Israeli State Minister of Agriculture and Development.

And yet, Zionists will tell you that “This is not a genocide, Hamas are using Palestinians as human shields!”

the first five quotes that showed up for me, and there are 125 more…

eregyrn-falls:

jbbartram-illu:

ramshacklefey:

executeness:

chokolattejedi:

irrelevantlyvalid:

nickyandmikey:

nickyandmikey:

when two musicians sing into the same microphone and lean in very close to each other… like omg are you guys gonna kiss now to relieve the homoerotic tension?😳

THIS IS NOT ABOUT ONE DIRECTION I DON’T KNOW WHO THIS “HARRY” PERSON IS GO WATCH BRUCE SPRINGSTEEN AND CLARENCE CLEMONS KISS ON STAGE RIGHT NOW

op is the only valid person i’ve ever met. everyone else needs to come to the light

Okay, but this is really important: Bruce Springsteen occupied this really weird place in music history. His songs were all from this pessimistic, nihilistic view of an America that had let him down:

Just like the anti-Vietnam War protest songs that we associate with the 1960s, or the early nihilism that spawned punk music in the 1970s. But he didn’t *sound* like a punk anarchist; he sounded like a country rock singer. When he released Born in the U.S.A. people completely misinterpreted (or possibly ignored) the lyrics in favor of the tone of the music.

Politicians used his music to promote their ‘Murica Yes! brand, and he had to literally explain that that was not what he was about. He’s over here asking when we’re going to have jobs and heathcare, not stanning the politicians who weren’t helping the people.

It was also kind of a big deal that he had an integrated band, because even as late as the 1980s music was still kind of segregated and MTV was straight up racist. They refused to play and promote black artists and then claimed that were no black artists in the first place. Michael Jackson’s record company had to threaten a boycott of their white artists to get MTV to play his Thriller video.

Plus, the first black/white interracial kiss on TV was in 1968 (OG Star Trek). Also it took us until the 70s to get sympathetic gay characters on screen, and the 90s to get gay characters to kiss onscreen. And all of those firsts were met with outrage.

So keep that in mind when you see Bruce Springsteen not just playing with an interracial band, but engaging in an interracial, gay kiss on stage repeatedly.

Passages from American Popular Music by Larry Starr and Christopher Waterman

I used to think that Bruce and Clarence kissing onstage was exuberance, showmanship, and telling racist homophobes to fuck off. Like, they picked up a certain kind of audience and went “Racist homophobes? Not in our house!” And started the kissing then but then I actually looked it up and

https://www.gq.com/story/this-fucked-me-up-bruce-springsteen-singing-about-clarence-clemons

It was a story where… we remade the city. We remade the city, shaping it into the kind of place where our friendship and our love for one another wouldn’t have been such an exceptional thing. - Bruce Springsteen

It wasn’t about showmanship or rejecting bigots or anything it was just. Damn right that was one of the loves of his life and damn right he was going to kiss him onstage

It gets me a little that Bruce has had a divorce, that he’s been married twice, but he loved Clarence for the rest of Clarence’s life and will presumably love him the rest of his own

Clemons said in one interview. “Bruce and I looked at each other and didn’t say anything, we just knew. We knew we were the missing links in each other’s lives. He was what I’d been searching for.” In another version of the story, Clemons says “He looked at me, and I looked at him, and we fell in love.”

I’m having some emotions about it!

“He was elemental in my life,“ Springsteen adds, “and losing him was like losing the rain.”

Not just! I love you pure and deep and true but! I am going to love you like that in front of the whole damn world!

We have fewer narratives about taking risks and making statements for platonic love rather than romantic and supposedly it would be easier to downplay this onstage than romance and! They refused! They fucking refused! In front of hundreds of thousands of people, over the course of years! In the spotlight, in word and deed, I love you!

God I’m not okay about it

Now I’m mad that this is not among any of the things I was ever told about this artist.

I knew about this in general (& via all those fabulous photos), but this just adds even more beautiful context <3

Just to add to the pile: this was the cover of Springsteen’s break-through album Born to Run, in 1975:

I mean, will you LOOK at this:

This was the pic chosen for the album cover from an extensive photoshoot, too. A few others:

There’s a lot more online if you search. They’re all pretty amazing. But the photographer is right, the one chosen for the album cover just pops.

soldierkitten:

just a dump of doodles I had for something I came up with instead of sleeping. posting this on Tumblr only because I am nervous :))

only-cat-memes:

Your daily dose of cat memes

goat-heirop:

Look its the Tumblr live shutdown warning!

lakemojave:

lakemojave:

Sorry my posts haven’t been as frequent or funny as usual. It’s because I’m eating well, sleeping regularly, and exercising

useless-englandfacts:

so when israel bombs innocent palestinians it’s all “ummm ahhh i don’t knowwwww it’s complicated!!!”, but when the yemeni forces are the only group to take action against israel by posing an economic threat to the rest of us it’s immediately air strikes on yemen. okay.

olibavee:

olibavee:

took a depression nap and all i remember from my nap dreams is a nonsensical t-shirt design that left me feeling dazed and confused after i woke up.

gehe-lihiyot-androgynos-varda-d:

Intersex people aren’t a rounding error, you can’t dismiss our existence simply because it is inconvenient for you to believe we matter.

People like me should be seen as valuable just because we are people.

Don’t make your emotional investment in the “sex binary” my problem.

l0stvegas:

somitomi:

sufficientlylargen:

l0stvegas:

God I hate these fucking floating monoliths. They always go, like, 10mph below the speed limit and if you try to pass them they just fucking distort reality around them until you’re back behind them again. One of them cut me off on the highway once and when I honked it banished me to a hoary netherworld where I wandered, lost and alone, for untold centuries, trapped in the liminal space between what could have been and what never was, black stars dotting the bright infinity yawning out around me as I drove out of thought and time, through endless ruined cities and blighted lands unmarked by the sun’s cold rays, and when I finally got out I was more than 20m late for my dentist appointment and they had to reschedule me.

Hey? Hey holy shit

kittykatninja321:

tshirt that says I ❤️ Violent Catharsis

worms-in-my-brain:

:

unfortunately i have to see discourse on my dash every day that makes me think some of y'all are really only posturing about the whole being a gender weirdo freak thing

“can you treat a trans woman as an equal if she has visible facial hair, or a trans man who has visible breasts?” is a good starting point but let me ask you some more questions.

could you have a normal conversation with a 50 year old transsexual who still considers himself a mother to his son? can you be in community with retransitioners and genderqueer people with non-normative transition trajectories? can you have a nice chat with someone who was afab and calls themself transfemme, or with someone who was amab and calls themself transmasc?

and even more! do you welcome the guy in a dress who calls himself a transvestite and has been doing drag every saturday for the past 10 years to your pride parade? are you willing to hear out the young woman who had bottom surgery at 18 and now kinda wishes she didn’t? do you actually respect the people who decide not to go on hrt or to get surgery due to their family’s medical history?

they may be hypothetical to you, but those are the people i have met and hang out with every day.

and you might answer yes to all of these, obviously, but could you actually say that when actually meeting them? because i’ve seen for myself that, no, the hypothetical and reality don’t always align.

Some people on this website will call themselves boygirl gender freaks and then have a tantrum when I talk about being a nonbinary intersex transfemasc intergender trans (wo)man.

You can call yourself whatever you want but if you break down the moment someone doesn’t fit into your tme/tma amab/afab transmasc/transfem binary you’re more of a gender cop than anything else

thelazzyblogzz:

Public doman

sickly-sapphic:

i know theyre tumblr favourites but just a reminder that the creators/etc of percy jackson, fnaf, good omens, our flag means death and the last of us are all either supporting israel or “neutral” on the subject, plus many of the streaming services are directly supporting genocide

taswelle:

Rest in peace Jellie, you wonderful queen

argumate:

argumate:

dude

look when I write a dumb throwaway post that gets two hundred thousand even dumber throwaway comments I feel obliged to read each and every one, it’s hell

nativenews:

serial-unaliver-deactivated2024:

they hate us control freaks for making sure everyone else does things the correct way

basalt-havic:

the opposite if mwah is hawm. fucking bite you.

helloitsbees:

me-beef:

some doodles of the worlds best sister gods

the-haiku-bot:

dookerino:

squeakitties:

don’t trust a word out of anybody that seriously alleges that pornography isn’t art btw

Sometimes you just can’t beat the story being told by porn tbh

Sometimes you just can’t

beat the story being told

by porn tbh

Beep boop! I look for accidental haiku posts. Sometimes I mess up.

gaycism:

anyone need serotonin?

catatonic-chaos-climax:

only-cat-memes:

my cats love when I do this, especially if they yell at a seagull or something and I then start yelling at the seagull they’re like “woah he understands 😨”

chromegnomes:

the most frustrating thing about AI Art from a Discourse perspective is that the actual violation involved is pretty nebulous

like, the guys “laundering” specific artists’ styles through AI models to mimic them for profit know exactly what they’re doing, and it’s extremely gross

but we cannot establish “my work was scraped from the public internet and used as part of a dataset for teaching a program what a painting of a tree looks like, without anyone asking or paying me” as, legally, Theft with a capital T. not only is this DMCA Logic which would be a nightmare for 99% of artists if enforced to its conclusion, it’s not the right word for what’s happening

the actual Violation here is that previously, “I can post my artwork to share with others for free, with minimal risk” was a safe assumption, which created a pretty generous culture of sharing artwork online. most (noteworthy) potential abuses of this digital commons were straightforwardly plagiarism in a way anyone could understand

but the way that generative AI uses its training data is significantly more complicated - there is a clear violation of trust involved, and often malicious intent, but most of the common arguments used to describe this fall short and end up in worse territory

by which I mean, it’s hard to put forward an actual moral/legal solution unless you’re willing to argue:

it’s extremely annoying to talk about, because you’ll see people straight up gloating about their Intent To Plagiarize, but it’s hard to stick them with any specific crime beyond Generally Scummy Behavior unless you want to create some truly horrible precedents and usher in The Thousand Year Reign of Intellectual Property Law

i-love-linux-and-need-cat-ears:

sexygaywizard:

the image of the cockpit has large screens, which wasn’t common on any airliner during 2001. iirc only the a350 and the 787 have such large screens. only the 787 has a yoke like in the picture. and the 787 was introduced after 9/11. i looked it up and both involved planes were 767s.

this is a picture of a 767 cockpit:

alexs-random-bullshit:

polyfragmentdid:

If you’re a “neurodivergent safe space” are you normal about people with NPD? Are you normal about systems? People with psychosis?

If you only mean adhd and autism, make yourself clear.

Imo i couldn’t care less in terms of “people im ok with”

You a system? Thats cool bro, don’t commit crimes and ill be ok with you

Yknow?

gaytanic-panic:

sillyman-justgoofy:

this is printed out and pinned all over the walls at Tesla factories

yernemm:

they’re just shy :)
give them a hug :)

edwordsmyth:

Sara Ashour

i-identify-guns-in-posts:

patchoulism:

i-identify-guns-in-posts:

powerviolencebutch:

heaven011:

tops will be like “yeah I can host” and then bring u here

Benelli M4

Season 2 Episode 25 - A Canterlot Wedding (Part 1)

I am in love with you?

nativenews:

Members of the Navajo nation drape the Palestinian flag across their land, 2019

i-restuff:

i-restuff:

i-restuff:

I want you guys to read Mort’s Wikia and tell me what you think

ah yes, the notes.

ladyshinga:

I feel sorry for people named Al (A L) because I see the name and briefly feel annoyance until I’m like, oh, that doesn’t say AI

bewbin:

the villagers: OH MY GOD GET OUT OF HERE ITS A DRAGON ATTACK HES BURNING DOWN THE WHOLE VILLAGE

me noticing the “dragon” actually only has 2 hind legs instead of 4 legs: thats actually a w-

*flames engulf me completely*

derinthescarletpescatarian:

passionpeachy:

I can’t fucking stop being utterly transfixed by this gif I think this is how cocomelon babies feel when they see dancing strawberries

mysharona1987:

headspace-hotel:

sure pinterest whatever

argumate:

animate-mush:

My favorite thing about tumblr is the way we all come together as a community to help each other turn off whatever new feature just got rolled out

tumblr is a war between tumblr and tumblr

riley1cannon:

arguablysomaya:

new rule: if you don’t understand this you’re not allowed to write superman

#i’ve never smashed the reblog button faster.#if your batman can’t comfort a child then he’s not batman.#if your clark isn’t driven by an altruistic need to do good and has the will to do harm he’s probably not clark kent.

mariacallous:

I don’t know if I agree with everything in this article, but it definitely is making me think:

Of All the threats posed by Twitter since it fell under sketchy new management in October, one of them doubles as a promise. Twitter will devolve into pornography.

Porn’s not my cup of tea, but you have to admire its ferocity and cunning. It’s a mega-genre, something the poet-philosopher Timothy Morton might call a hyperobject, ungraspable in its ubiquity and scale. In effect, porn online behaves like a predator plant, saturating the pixels with flesh colors, choking off biodiverse memes, and sowing vast digital acreage with salt.

Tumblr, which started as an artsy microblogging service in 2007, lost its allure when it was overrun by porn five years later. Chatroulette, which was founded in 2009 as a whimsical way to meet strangers, traded its lightheartedness for dick pics and leering goons almost immediately. OnlyFans, which began in 2016 as a platform for performers to post videos, now consists mostly of porn created by sex workers.

But most companies aim to marginalize porn. While OnlyFans has surrendered, Chatroulette and Tumblr appear to take a firmer stand than ever against it. Facebook and YouTube conscript armies of algorithms and humans to banish porn in deference to advertisers who don’t want brands debased by unwholesome adjacencies. Alone among the big social media services, Twitter allows users to post what it calls “intimate media.” But the platform also permanently suspends users who post upskirts, creepshots, revenge porn, nonconsensual erotica, images shot with hidden cameras, or media accompanied by incitements to violence. Pornographic images, which make up about 13 percent of all tweets, cannot yet be directly sold.

Porn in its place may be bankable, in other words, but too much of it in a venue styled as PG can scare off much bigger revenue streams.

Or so popular wisdom has it. Twitter’s new management, as usual, dissents. The volatile Chief Twit, Elon Musk, has torn down guardrails, eliminated moderators, and alienated advertisers all on his own with tiresome shitposting and hospitality to hate speech. Musk, whose personal fortune fell by $100 billion in 2022, pretends to insouciance about money in a way that’s unconvincing and hard to watch. When General Mills, General Motors, Pfizer, Ford, and Mondeléz International (the august maker of Oreos) stopped advertising on Twitter last fall, Musk lashed out at corporate America for its failure to respect the wishes of the founding fathers, who presciently mandated advertising on Twitter in 1789. Unchastened, half of the platform’s top 100 advertisers were gone in Musk’s first month.

Without moderators or advertisers, swaths of Twitter are now mangy empty lots crawling with vandals, lechers, con men, and swastikas. The time is perhaps right for porn, then. Porn abhors a vacuum. Especially where it can be ennobled as constitutional duty.

How in the world is this good news? I’ll tell you why it’s good news to me. Not only will it make Twitter2 easily quittable, but it’s pleasing to see things become what they deep down are. Twitter has slouched toward porn for years. “Slipping into DMs” is only one salacious meme in what long ago became an orgy of hyperstimulation, with people baring their souls, posting thirst traps, coyly subtweeting, and of course negging and prodding and simultaneously secreting dopamine and cortisol and God knows what other precious bodily fluids.

“I am mad for it to be in contact with me,” Walt Whitman wrote, of what he called “life’s atmosphere.” No doubt he also meant contact with the bodies of the many people he cruised and desired. Likewise, Twitter seems to offer contact with everyone, and the interface exists to make users mad for contact as it conjures life’s atmosphere of abrasiveness streaked with sweetness. The real Twitter was the friends we made along the way, as someone has surely tweeted.

That’s gone now. When the chief rolls in with tryhard trolling that misses the mark of humor, squealing in annoying feedback loops from his Wall of Sound, the warm chatter among the regulars goes silent. A pall falls. When Musk tweeted some horror fiction alleging that the spouse of a prominent elected official might have been perversely complicit in cracking his own skull with a hammer, something at the heart of Twitter seemed to die. Later, when he bellowed that Twitter in 2020 had abridged the constitutional right of trolls to post a Hunter Biden dick pic, another influx of refugees poured into Mastodon, which presents itself as a more normal haven for people fleeing Twitter.

“The Internet Is for Porn” was the catchiest song from Avenue Q, which debuted 20 years ago. That was before broadband, before social media, before the hijack of information space by influence operations and strongman solo acts like GOP trinity Kanye, Elon, and Trump. It was axiomatic back then. Porn was the internet’s reason for being, its prime directive. And it would have stayed that way had web information not been domesticated by corporations that wanted to hack our worldviews and pick our pockets for data, attention, and mobile payments.

But through all this, Twitter has retained the spirit of porn. Like porn, Twitter is not a family affair; for many, it’s also a shameful habit that they’re forever trying to quit. Since 2007, I’ve turned to Twitter to—the only word I can think of is learn. But I know its traps well. Users of Twitter, like consumers of porn, find themselves amused and stimulated, and then scroll compulsively, chasing the dragon of human connection, only to find themselves scrolling through doom, and finally scrolling for doom.

Information may or may not want to be free, but it often wants to be porn. What Musk has considered doing, according to various reports, is introduce paywalled video that would allow performers to get paid while Twitter takes a cut. Sound at all familiar? It’s the OnlyFans model, complete with a rip-off of the OnlyFans interface. The performers it’s tailor-made for are not, as it happens, cellists or mimes. They’re sex workers. And for discerning high rollers who prefer the backroom to the club, Musk has floated the idea of offering paid DMs—to be slipped into as usual, but for a fee. The online-porn business demands extreme discipline to keep it from turning criminal and leaves room for little else, but edgelord Musk is likely to fare better in the demimonde than he is on the main stage.

At the very end of 2022, NSFW content was the fastest-growing sector of English-language Twitter. It’s the way of the world, especially without diligent moderation. At the same time, the new louche Twitter comes with a harum-scarum idea of “free speech” as singularly applicable to obscene provocateurs like Jordan Peterson and Marjorie Taylor Greene, formerly banned figures who were warmly welcomed back to the site in November. “This is a battle for the future of civilization,” the Chief Twit tweeted. “If free speech is lost even in America, tyranny is all that lies ahead.”

If Twitter is going to prey on users with hyper-arousing material and the illusion of intimacy, why not go all the way? Twitter should admit what it’s up to, tell risk-averse advertisers to go blow if they’re prudes, and turn full red-light district. It might scare away the squares, but Twitter can charge a mint for spank-bank material, and a premium for the kind that somehow prevents tyranny.